AccreditED: University of Minnesota Law School case study

The Binger Center’s programming includes clinics, events, and resources. Its program leadership promotes a range of far-left ideologies.

The Binger Center offers immigration-related legal clinics, outreach programs, and pro bono legal services.

• The Binger Center’s “Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic” seeks to “transform U.S. immigration law through collaborative impact litigation.”  
  • Students will learn “skills important to the effective representation of clients in federal immigration litigation,” including “asylum and related issues, challenges to the unlawful detention of immigrants, as well as the intersection of immigration and criminal law.” 
  • Students are also expected to engage in “policy advocacy outside the courtroom” that furthers the Center’s priorities for “systemic change in immigration law.” 
  • A job posting for a fellowship with the clinic noted that “strong preference” would be given to candidates who are fluent in Somali. 
• The Binger Center’s “Detainee Rights Clinic” teaches students to represent illegal aliens who are “impacted by either or both the criminal justice system and the immigration deportation system.” 
  • The clinic also provides opportunities for students to “advocate for changes to the current system” by “creating a state legislative campaign” and drafting legislation or “working with state agencies … to create or craft changes to rules.” 

The Binger Center regularly hosts events, including a yearly forum and various discussions and training sessions. In 2022, the Binger Center hosted a “Community Discussion on Deportation Abolition.” 

• In 2024, the Binger Center hosted a discussion about a book titled, Welcome the Wretched: In Defense of the “Criminal Alien.” 
  • The author argued that the U.S. should not use the criminal legal system to help prioritize targets of deportation. 
• In 2018, the Binger Center hosted a discussion on how Minnesota law students helped lead a “nationwide effort to stop the deportation of Somali immigrants.” 
• The Binger Center’s 2025 Fall Immigration Forum featured speakers from far-left activist organizations including FWD.us and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). 
• The forum featured discussions on how U.S. citizenship has been “mobilized and weaponized to sustain structural racism” and how it can be “reimagined to advance racial equity.” 
• The forum also discussed legal and legislative strategies for “protecting and advancing immigrant rights” as well as “litigation to address overreach of federal immigration authorities.” 
• The Binger Center’s 2024 Fall Immigration Forum discussed how “systemic racism and economic exploitation shape the immigrant experience” and how immigration policies “exploit immigrants of color for economic gain.” 
  • The forum included a training exercise on organizing union workers for immigration activism. 
  • The forum claimed law enforcement perpetuates “whiteness” through racist stereotyping. 

The Binger Center has published resources encouraging defense lawyers to downplay and omit facts about the criminal records of their clients to help them avoid deportation: 

• In a document discussing the immigration-related consequences of criminal convictions, the Binger Center notes that offenders should “avoid admitting guilt or facts sufficient to prove guilt” as well as “facts showing baseness, vileness, depravity, or reprehensible conduct.” 

• The document gives tips on how to avoid aggravated felony convictions such as violent crimes. 

• The document adds, “If possible, avoid jail/prison sentences (probation is better).” 

In 2015, the Binger Center published a “practice advisory” for immigration attorneys with clients facing drug offenses.  

• The document advises attorneys to “scrub” their clients’ record of conviction by “omitting mention of a specific substance in the record,” noting that immigration judges will therefore be unable to find the “underlying facts of the substance involved” during deportation proceedings. (page 9) 

• The document also advises attorneys to “remove mention of a specific substance from the record of conviction” and “seek a pre-trial diversion program … that does not require a formal admission of facts.” (page 11) 

• The document similarly suggests scrubbing the record of specific details about drug paraphernalia, such as methamphetamine pipes. (page 15) 

The Binger Center published a template draft of a motion against deportation proceedings that provides language claiming their clients would face “persecution” in their home country. 

In 2021, the Binger Center published a report stating that the “laws used to prosecute people for reentering the U.S. after deportation are rooted in racism, eugenics, and white supremacist ideology.” 

• The report accused ICE of perpetuating the “racist history of policing and prisons in the U.S.” 

The Binger Center links to a “Constitutional Observer Handbook” that trains activists on “rapid response” tactics to monitor ICE activity. 

The Binger Center offers a resource on “How You Can Be an Immigrant Ally Locally” from left-wing activist organization Indivisible, which discusses ways to promote local sanctuary city laws. 

Longtime immigration activist Sarah Brenes is the executive director of the Binger Center. 

• Brenes states that her mission is to “lighten the legal load noncitizens are forced to carry in an unwelcoming legal system and often hostile political environment in which we all need them to thrive.” 
• Brenes supports “police abolition” and shared articles on her social media in defense of looting and rioting during the George Floyd riots. 

Linus Chan is the director of the Binger Center’s Detainee Rights Clinic. 

• In 2025, Chan wrote an article arguing that the president should have the power to grant clemency to prevent deportation of criminal aliens.  
  • Chan wrote, “As we face an unprecedented era of criminal deportations divorced from individualized assessments of justice, presidential clemency offers a constitutionally sound mechanism to restore proportionality and humanity to our immigration system.” 
• Chan has also written articles titled, “Process as Suffering: How U.S. Immigration Court Process and Culture Prevent Substantive Justice,” “How the Harm of Immigration Detention Must Be Factored in Custody Decisions,” and “Unjust Deserts: How the Modern Deportation System Lacks Moral Credibility.” 
  • Chan claims the Trump administration “seems to value fear.” 

Nadia Anguiano is the director of the Binger Center’s Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic. 

• Anguiano’s work focuses on “challenges to the adverse immigration consequences of criminal convictions” and “post-conviction relief.” 

Litigation & advocacy fellow Kimberly Medina has focused on “providing representation to detained individuals caught at the intersection of criminal and immigration law.”