Dallas Independent School District appears to use transgender guidelines created by Texas Association of School Boards


Parents Defending Education submitted a public records request to the Dallas Independent School District requesting any documents that served as guidance on transgender issues within the district or any documents dealing with transgender issues from the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB). PDE received a document back from the district titled “Legal Issues Related to Transgender Students” that was created by the TASB. The document has a date of 2022. The document provides several questions and answers on transgender issues. PDE originally found another version of the document from the Round Rock Independent School District.

With one question, the document asks: “What if a parent does not support a student’s gender transition?” The document then provides a vague answer that mentions not using the preferred pronouns and names of students with parents. This tactic is often used to keep parents in the dark regarding the gender identity of their children. The document states:

As such, a student may request that a district employee not tell his or her parent about the student’s gender identity. School officials should proceed with caution in this case, in accordance with district policy regarding student counseling, crisis intervention, and child abuse. It may be possible to reach an agreement with the student and parent that satisfies everyone: for example, schools have instructed staff to call a transgender student by the student’s preferred name at school but to refer to the student by the name on the birth certificate in all communications with parents.

The document also appears to label “bullying” of a transgender person as a form of sexual harassment. The document states: “Bullying of a student because of the student’s nonconformity with gender norms is a form of harassment based on sex in violation of federal law.” The document later adds: “If a complaint is filed alleging discrimination or harassment of a transgender student, school officials should work closely with the district’s attorney.” The document also mentions that refusing to use a student’s preferred pronouns and name is a form of discrimination:

OCR and DOJ’s 2021 guidance cites a failure to address a transgender student by the student’s chosen name and pronouns as an example of sex-based discrimination within the agencies’ enforcement authority under Title IX.

The document also explains that refusing to allow students to use their preferred restrooms and locker rooms is a form of discrimination. The document states: “OCR and DOJ’s 2021 guidance cites a district’s refusal to allow a transgender student to use the restroom according to the student’s gender identity as an example of sex-based discrimination within the federal agencies’ enforcement authority under Title IX.” The following peculiar comment is also made in the document: “In addition, President Biden is urging Congress to pass a statute that would supersede state laws denying rights to transgender individuals.”

The Dallas Independent School District pays the TASB for a wide range of services. PDE received a list of invoices that the district had with the TASB from 2018 to 2023. The invoices over five years accumulate to approximately $1.4 million paid to the TASB. Very few details were shared to PDE regarding what the invoices were for. One invoice for $750 had the description of “membership.” PDE also received contracts the district had with the TASB for Medicaid services.

PDE requested emails from district officials and board members with members of the TASB regarding transgender and LGBTQ issues. However, no files were received for this part of the request.